The increasing demand for avocados in Lancaster (UK), Europe and North America has taken a yearning of global production in just 20 years. However, it is controversial due to the environmental impacts of popular fruit farming and distributing them worldwide.

These issues themselves are not vested for avocados, which can still be part of a permanent, healthy diet. Rather they reflect some deep root problems related to their production.

Avocados is a native of Central and South America, where hot, temperate climate provides ideal increasing conditions.There are hundreds of varieties, although today most of us are people who are familiar with today, the Huss variety, which can be traced back from a tree planted about 100 years ago. One of recent decades to increase the popularity of avocado's popularity The part comes from its marketing as "superfood". Although some health claims can be overstated, they are actually a good source of vitamins, minerals and unsaturated fat, giving them their satisfactory, creamy textures.

So why have avocados become so controversial? Like a lot of modern agriculture, most avocado plantations depend a lot on fertilizer and fossil fuel, which contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. They have smaller yields compared to many other crops and hence have high carbon footprints per kilogram.On average, avocados has a carbon footprint of about 2.5 kg CO of equivalent (kg co₂e) per kg - these are all greenhouse gases, which result in the production and transportation of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide. Warming. The carbon footprint of Avocados is more than double the banana (0.9 kg co₂e per kg) and is five times higher than apples (0.4kg co₂e per kg), although it is slightly poor than only tomatoes (2kg co₂e per kg).

But these figures are smaller than the global average carbon footprint of most animal-oriented products. One kilogram of eggs have a carbon footprint of 4.6 kg Co₂e, one kilogram of chicken comes in 9.8kg co₂e, and one kilogram is a result of an average of 85 kg Co₂e as a result of beef.For people outside the US, large distance avocados can often not be a big deal as a trip as usually considered, at least in the context of carbon. The vast majority of the avocado are sent, which is relatively low carbon because large amounts can be transported in the same journey. Even when they are taken thousands of miles away, shipping resulted in only 0.2 kg Co₂e per kg of avocado, which often leads to much less than the footprints. Peeping enters on other issues. Excessively over shipping has created a food system that is unsafe for shocks and disruption, where logging and logistics bottlenecks (for example, interruption of the Suez canal by a container ship in 2021), famine or war in a part of the world Many other countries may have disruption or lack of food.The problem is likely to increase in the form of climate crisis. This issue is not unique to avocados, but moving towards more locally supplied foods can lead to more flexibility and can help protect against future food deficiency.

An environmental burden is very thirsty plants, which require an average of about 1,000 liters of water per kg of water. This is more than most other fruits and vegetables, but less than some grains such as rice. The main issue is that avocados are grown in areas that are already water-stunned.Mexico, the world's top avocado manufacturer, has been experiencing drought for a long time, so irrigation of avocado plantation can reduce the access to the local population. This issue of proper water distribution may deteriorate in the coming decades.

Nature also has an impact to consider. Traditionally, avocado trees were planted in mixed plots along with other crops and were cut as a subsistence food, in which only surplus was exported. This practice changed due to the demand of America and Europe.Avocados is now mainly grown mainly as an export crop, switching on large, monocline plantation to maximize productivity with production. These monocultures have pushed other indigenous crops and are much more unsafe for pests and illness than mixed planting.

This means that more and more versions of pesticides and synthetic fertilizers are required to be used. These, in turn, negatively affect biodiversity, soil quality and human health negatively.

Worse, new avocado plantations are harvesting forests in some areas.25,000 hectares of forest is being cleaned every year in the state of Michoacan, the main avocado producing area of ​​Mexico, which supplies most of the avocados sold in the US. Michoq has a rich forest cover in Michoq which has many endange Is home. Increasing avocado production in this region can therefore be a major threat to biodiversity.

Finally, there are human effects to consider. While avocado business can help in local population by providing income for farmers, they are also those who are feeling the brunt of environmental issues.In addition, avocado gardens have been linked to organized crime and human rights violations, some cities and villages are getting so sick from problems that they have completely declared avocado completely.

Disappointing, no easy answer. In search of faretrad or systematically produced avocado, it may help in terms of human and biodiversity effects, but certification processes are right and often very expensive for small -scale farmers in developing countries. They cannot give results in low emissions than monoclonic tree plantations. Avocados is not an environmental burden food.They have very low carbon footprints than most of the animal products and are one of the many crops where a single variety dominates the market. But neither should we reject the loss that avocado production is happening on nature and local population.

The best advice for consumers may be to consider alternative varieties of avocado where it is possible to reduce the demand for monoculture plantation. Where these are not available, the next best thing is to try to keep avocados as a treatment regularly instead of staples.(Dialogue) NSA

NSA