New Delhi [India], In the wake of the recent Surat Lok Sabha seat issue, motivational speaker Shiv Kheda sought directions to the Supreme Court to frame rules for promoting NOTA as a "fictitious candidate" and holding re-elections in Parliamentary Is. On seats where NOTA gets majority, a bench headed by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud issued notice to the Election Commission of India on a petition filed by Shiv Kheda, seeking directions to frame rules to the effect that if NOTA If it gets majority, then elections should be held in that particular constituency. Shiv Khera, in his petition, also sought to make a rule saying that a candidate who gets less votes than NOTA will be debarred from contesting elections for a period of five years. Senior advocate Gopal Shankaranarayan, appearing for Shiv Kheda, apprised the Supreme Court about the current status of Surat Lok Sabha elections to ensure proper and efficient reporting/publicity of NOTA over the years and as a "fictitious candidate". In Surat, since there was no other candidate, everyone had to go for only one candidate, he informed the bench, Shiv Kheda, in his petition filed through advocate on record Sheeta Majumdar, asked about the guidelines regarding uniform or Demanded direction to the Election Commission of India to make rules.Implementation of NOTA vote option with consequences for candidates who did not proceed to NOTA In November 2013, the Election Commission and various State Election Commissions implemented the None of the Above (NOTA) option in the EVMS in central level as well as local body elections. Presented. According to the petitioner, the most significant change in the form of NOTA was seen in Maharashtra, Haryana, Delhi and Puducherry. "The concerned State Election Commission (SEC) announced that if NOTA emerged as the winner in any election, there would be mandatory re-polling. This was the first significant change in the electoral system since the inception of NOTA. The notification further issued NOTA has been placed as a hypothetical candidate by the respective State Election Commissions and it has been clearly assumed that the second highest candidate will be declared the winner (if NOTA gets the highest number of votes), the underlying principles of NOTA and The purpose is violated,” the petition further said. The petition states that the implementation of NOTA since 2013 has not served the purpose it was supposed to.The petition said that the apex court had intended to introduce NOTA with the hope that NOTA would increase voter participation in elections but this did not happen. Seems to have been achieved. The petitioner urged that this can be done only if the Election Commission, the State and the Center give NOTA the same powers as in Maharashtra, Delhi, Puducherry and Haryana. The option of NOTA in Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) is a result of this. The voter has the 'right to reject' in our electoral system and before India, 13 other countries have adopted negative voting or the right to reject, the plea said, adding that the Election Commission of India will not accept NOTA as a valid candidate. The petition states that NOTA is not merely a citizen who does not vote, but is actually a legitimate selection. The electoral system, State Election Commissions using their power in the Constitution of India, 1950 have turned that idealistic idea into reality.The petitioner urged that the beginning made by the Panchayat and municipal elections in 4 states should be implemented equally at all levels, "The idea and purpose of NOTA is to put pressure on political parties to field better candidates. “Instances keep coming when almost all the candidates in a constituency have criminal cases pending against them, what does a voter do? NOTA is a powerful weapon in the hands of the voter,” the petition said.