While the BJP has delved into and shared videos of minority appeasement politics by Congress governments, there is also discussion on social media about how there was a 'soft corner' for minorities and how it 'demonised' the majority community. made.
From 2004 to the beginning of the UPA government, several incidents occurred that clearly point to the grand old party's minority inclination to cultivate a committed vote bank.
In 2004, the Congress-led UPA government repealed the anti-terrorism law, the Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA).
The then government may have had the right intentions, but the serial terrorist attacks across the country in subsequent years belied its objective.
The Sachar Committee, appointed by the Dr. Manmohan Singh government in 2005 to study the social, economic and educational conditions of Muslims, was seen as a partisan move.In 2006, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said that minorities, especially Muslims, should have the first claim on the country's resources.
PM Modi made the same gesture in his Rajasthan rally, which caused deep resentment in Congress circles.
In 2007, the term 'saffron terror' attracted as much attention as controversy.
From the Congress government to the top leadership of the party, everyone used it as a handle to attack the BJP and defame the RSS.
The Batla House encounter was a remarkable achievement by the Delhi Police but it became a victim of Congress's appeasement politics.However, the government refrained from saying much, with Congress calling it a fake encounter and its ecosystem maligning the brave police officers who killed the terrorists in the deadly encounter.
According to top Congress leader Salman Khurshid, the then party president Soni Gandhi also cried after seeing the dead body.
The 2008 Mumbai terrorist attacks, which desecrated India's financial capital, left the entire nation angry and enraged.
Pakistani terrorist Ajmal Kasab was captured alive and he also openly confessed about Pakistan's conspiracy to spread terror in India.
Despite all this, Digvijay Singh, who has close links to the Gandhi family, issued a statement and claimed that the 26/11 attacks were an RSS conspiracy.
The Communal Violence Bill, proposed by the Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council (NAC) in 2011, also invited huge controversy.Akhilesh Mishra, CEO of Bluecraft Digital Foundation, claims that the proposed law had provisions that could "turn Hindus into second-class citizens in their own country."
Meanwhile, the Congress party is likely to approach the Election Commission demanding action against PM Modi's 'highly divisive' statement at the Rajasthan election rally. But, its series of anti-majority or anti-Hindu stances during UPA-I and UPA-II, as mentioned above, leads one to believe that it 'deserves the right response'.'
From 2004 to the beginning of the UPA government, several incidents occurred that clearly point to the grand old party's minority inclination to cultivate a committed vote bank.
In 2004, the Congress-led UPA government repealed the anti-terrorism law, the Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA).
The then government may have had the right intentions, but the serial terrorist attacks across the country in subsequent years belied its objective.
The Sachar Committee, appointed by the Dr. Manmohan Singh government in 2005 to study the social, economic and educational conditions of Muslims, was seen as a partisan move.In 2006, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said that minorities, especially Muslims, should have the first claim on the country's resources.
PM Modi made the same gesture in his Rajasthan rally, which caused deep resentment in Congress circles.
In 2007, the term 'saffron terror' attracted as much attention as controversy.
From the Congress government to the top leadership of the party, everyone used it as a handle to attack the BJP and defame the RSS.
The Batla House encounter was a remarkable achievement by the Delhi Police but it became a victim of Congress's appeasement politics.However, the government refrained from saying much, with Congress calling it a fake encounter and its ecosystem maligning the brave police officers who killed the terrorists in the deadly encounter.
According to top Congress leader Salman Khurshid, the then party president Soni Gandhi also cried after seeing the dead body.
The 2008 Mumbai terrorist attacks, which desecrated India's financial capital, left the entire nation angry and enraged.
Pakistani terrorist Ajmal Kasab was captured alive and he also openly confessed about Pakistan's conspiracy to spread terror in India.
Despite all this, Digvijay Singh, who has close links to the Gandhi family, issued a statement and claimed that the 26/11 attacks were an RSS conspiracy.
The Communal Violence Bill, proposed by the Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council (NAC) in 2011, also invited huge controversy.Akhilesh Mishra, CEO of Bluecraft Digital Foundation, claims that the proposed law had provisions that could "turn Hindus into second-class citizens in their own country."
Meanwhile, the Congress party is likely to approach the Election Commission demanding action against PM Modi's 'highly divisive' statement at the Rajasthan election rally. But, its series of anti-majority or anti-Hindu stances during UPA-I and UPA-II, as mentioned above, leads one to believe that it 'deserves the right response'.'
