Canberra, The Antarctic Treaty System has long been praised as an example of successful international co-operation. But can there be any danger from this?

It's very hot in Kochi, southern India, where representatives from at least 60 countries have gathered for two important meetings on the future of Antarctica, the world's coldest continent.

The 46th Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting and the accompanying 26th meeting of the Committee on Environmental Protection also include observers from a number of non-governmental organizations interested in the regulation of Antarctic tourism and the protection of its environment. But in contrast to the temperatures outside, recent reports The atmosphere inside the meeting venue has turned cool after Russia discovered huge quantities of OI and gas in the British Antarctic Territory.

Mining activities in Antarctica are prohibited under the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty, which was adopted in 1991, with Australia playing a leading role.Russia's activities are worrying other countries, fearing they would inevitably break the treaty if the prospects escalated. It all sets the stage for an interesting meeting about a part of the world that is Australia's It is more important to national interests than you can imagine.

The Antarctica Consultative Meetings are regular annual meetings of State Parties to the Antarctic Treaty of 1959.

The meetings are where states work to collectively implement the treaty, which is the cornerstone of the system of governance for Antarctica known as the Antarctic Treaty System. The Antarctic Treaty was considered a diplomatic victory at the height of the Cold War I went.Concerned that the continent could become a site of conflict, the original 1 states meeting in Washington DC, which signed the treaty, agreed to use the Antarctic only for peaceful purposes.

The treaty allows the use of military personnel or equipment for scientific research or any other peaceful purposes, but prohibits measures of a military nature such as military maneuvers or weapons testing. Perhaps the most fundamental question addressed by the treaty is the geopolitical situation of the continent. Is of.

Seven states claimed specific parts of Antarctica – Argentina, Australia, Chile, France, New Zealand, Norway and the United Kingdom. Some claims overlap.The situation was further complicated by the fact that neither the United States nor the then-USSR made any formal claims. Australia has territorial rights to the Australian Antarctic Territory, which covers 42 percent of the Antarctic continent.

Contrary to popular opinion, the fact that some other countries have explicitly recognized Australia's title has no bearing on its legal validity.

The treaty includes an agreement to disagree on the question of territorial sovereignty. Australia is not required to give up its sovereignty, but neither are other states required to respect our territorial title during the lifetime of the treaty.The Antarctic Treaty is therefore of particular importance to Australia because it protects Australia's legal rights in relation to the Australian Antarctic Territory. Australia is an active and strong partner in the treatment system.

The treaty has been widely praised as an example of successful international cooperation.

It is easy to assume that harmony regarding Antarctica was – and remains – guaranteed by its remoteness, and easy to underestimate the significant achievement of the treaty system. But both changing geopolitics and a changing climate could affect this final frontier. Which will impact the whole world.A declaration on climate change was adopted at the 2023 meeting and new wording for the treaty system's website was also agreed upon – both of which can be understood as a response to the common misconception that mineral resource activities are prohibited except for scientific research. The ban will end in 2048.

There is no end date for the prohibition. Any party can request a review by the 204, but overturning the ban would involve a relatively complex process with no guarantee of success. Political tension is felt at the meetings, although more in relation to the issues that But there is more risk. Both Russia and Ukraine are parties to the treaty and the ongoing Russia–Ukraine war has created some opposition.

Russia prepared a paper for the 2023 meeting, addressing the "politicization" of the gathering.There are concerns that even before 2048 is reached, gray zone activities—nefarious or coercive activities that stop openly violating established rules and norms—could weaken the force of those norms or even destroy the treaty system as a whole. One of the most obvious rules regarding which gray zone activities can occur is prospecting versus scientific research.

The warning over Russia's alleged oil and gas activities can be understood in this light.

There are also concerns regarding China's Antarctic ambitions, both in relation to dual-use technology and in the context of China's goal of greater access to the resources of Antarctica and the Southern Ocean. Earlier this year China took up exploration on Inexpressible Island in the Ross Sea. Opened its fifth Antarctic facility, Qianlin Station.Australia's official Antarctic priorities or interests are set out in the 2020 update of the Australian Antarctic Strategy and 10-year Action Plan.

There is also a current federal government inquiry into the importance of Antarctica to Australia's national interests. Due to our proximity to Antarctica, climate change there, such as the melting of the Antarctic ice sheets and resulting sea level rise, could lead to the Indo-Pacific Can have a deep impact on geopolitics.

There are also concerns that the spread of bird flu in Antarctica could affect Australian poultry farms.When it comes to matters of Antarctic governance a strong Australian voice remains vital to ensuring Antarctica's peaceful and sustainable future (360info.org) PYPY