New Delhi [India], A Delhi court has convicted a man of double murder committed in the motive of robbery, saying the prosecution has been able to meet the chain of circumstances and beyond the shadow of all reasonable doubt. It has been proved that the accused has committed murder. Additional Sessions Judge Shefali Barnala Tandon, in her recent judgment, said, "Considering the forensic evidence, medical evidence, recovery of looted goods at the instance of the accused, crime scene report, photograph of the crime scene, MLC and postmortem report of the deceased, In view of the above discussions and findings, the statements of the independent witnesses were consistent, credible and reliable, the accused Deepanshu alias Deepu is held guilty and, accordingly, convicted for the offense under Section 302. Offenses punishable under IPC (punishment for murder) and sections 394 (voluntarily causing hurt while committing dacoity) and section 397 IPC (dacoity or dacoity, with attempt to cause death or grievous hurt), the court further said that the prosecution in the present case The party is able to prove the involvement of the accused in the commission of the crime beyond the shadow of all reasonable doubt because all the circumstances established are consistent with the hypothesis of the accused's guilt and the entire range of circumstantial evidence. Nothing is left from which to conclude the innocence of the accused persons and no other hypothesis is possible in the given circumstances. The prosecution is able to prove all the crimes that the accused has committed.He was charged and faced trial, the court said. The court further said that the accused failed to disclose the circumstances proved against him like recovery of mobile phone, purse, PAN card, photograph of deceased Mrs. Shashi, blood of both the deceased. The persons blamed her for wearing clothes and slippers, using her SIM in the looted mobile phone, fleeing the area immediately after the incident etc., although the burden of proof was put on them as per Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act. The case was pending under section 394 IPC read with section 397 IPC and section 302 IPC for double murder by causing injury with a deadly weapon i.e. scissors during the robbery of Rs. Rs 21,400, mobile phone, purse and some other items from his house in Patel Nagar, Delhi on June 14, 2015.