New Delhi [India], The Delhi High Court on Monday refused bail to three Indian Mujahideen (IM) operatives accused in the 2008 Delhi serial blasts case. Although the high court refused to grant him bail, it asked the trial court to expedite the trial. Since the accused persons have been behind the bars since 2008, a division bench of Justices Suresh Kumar Kait and Shalinder Kaur dismissed the appeal filed by Mubeen Kader Shaikh, Saqib Nisar and Mansoor Asga Peerbhoy. He had challenged the order of the trial court in which he was refused bail. The bench said, “We are informed that the special court is conducting proceedings every Saturday so as to expedite the conclusion of the trial, which is already in its final stages."Keeping in mind the peculiar facts of the present case and the fact that the appellant has been behind the bars since 2008, we direct the concerned special court to conclude the hearing in the present case by hearing it at least twice," the bench said in the judgment passed. Said. On Monday, the bench, while denying bail to Mansoor Asghar Peerbhoy, said that it has been alleged that the appellant is an active member of the terrorist organization "India Mujahideen" and leads the "Media Cell" group and also that he is a member of other Involved in conspiracy with. The accused persons had sent e-mails to electronic and print media on 13 September 2008 in connection with the serial bomb blasts in Ahmedabad, Mumbai and Delhi. The bench rejected Mubeen's bail and said that the appellant is a qualified computer engineer. And he has been accused of being an active member of the media cell of Indian Mujahideen.Considering the role of Saqib Nisar, the bench rejected his bail plea. The bench said that the interrogation also revealed that the location of his mobile number was revealed on September 3, 2008. Karol Bagh was, O Mo with mobile numbers. Atif Amin and Mohd. Shakeel and the location of his mobile on September 13, 2008 was Batla House. In the considered opinion of this Court, the allegations against the Appellant and the role attributed to him, do not persuade this Court to release the Appellant on bail.The court said.