The development comes after the Calcutta High Court expressed displeasure over the Bidhannagar City Police's plea that the CCTV footage had no recording of the moment where the celebrity MLA was seen brutally attacking restaurant owner Anisul Alam.
While the case came up for hearing in a single-judge bench of Justice Amrita Sinha of the Calcutta High Court, the latter said that while the police are claiming that no recording of the moment of the attack was made, the victim of the attack submitted to the court Have presented some video footage in which the incident of attack is clearly visible.
The next hearing on the case will be on July 31.
The court also questioned that if the moment of the attack was not recorded in the CCTV installed there, then from where did the victim submit the footage to the court? Subsequently, Bidhannagar City Police officials sent a show cause notice to the inspector in-charge of the local police station, under whose jurisdiction the said restaurant falls.
Recall that on the night of June 7, Chakraborty was captured on camera beating up Alam inside his restaurant premises. Later, the actor-turned-politician claimed that he hit Alam for making derogatory remarks against Trinamool general secretary and Lok Sabha MP Abhishek Banerjee.
However, Alam denied the allegation and accused Chakraborty of dragging Abhishek Banerjee's name to hide his crime. According to Alam, the dispute started when he asked Chakraborty's driver and bodyguards to remove the actor's car which was wrongly parked in the parking lot.
Although Chakraborty meanwhile got anticipatory bail from a district court in South 24 Parganas district, the victim approached Justice Sinha's bench for justice. On June 14, Justice Sinha had directed the police to preserve the documents related to the assault case.
While the case came up for hearing in a single-judge bench of Justice Amrita Sinha of the Calcutta High Court, the latter said that while the police are claiming that no recording of the moment of the attack was made, the victim of the attack submitted to the court Have presented some video footage in which the incident of attack is clearly visible.
The next hearing on the case will be on July 31.
The court also questioned that if the moment of the attack was not recorded in the CCTV installed there, then from where did the victim submit the footage to the court? Subsequently, Bidhannagar City Police officials sent a show cause notice to the inspector in-charge of the local police station, under whose jurisdiction the said restaurant falls.
Recall that on the night of June 7, Chakraborty was captured on camera beating up Alam inside his restaurant premises. Later, the actor-turned-politician claimed that he hit Alam for making derogatory remarks against Trinamool general secretary and Lok Sabha MP Abhishek Banerjee.
However, Alam denied the allegation and accused Chakraborty of dragging Abhishek Banerjee's name to hide his crime. According to Alam, the dispute started when he asked Chakraborty's driver and bodyguards to remove the actor's car which was wrongly parked in the parking lot.
Although Chakraborty meanwhile got anticipatory bail from a district court in South 24 Parganas district, the victim approached Justice Sinha's bench for justice. On June 14, Justice Sinha had directed the police to preserve the documents related to the assault case.
